Full data can be found at the old page while this page is being updated. Thanks.
Marja Bister and Kerry Emanuel
Program in Atmospheres, Oceans, and Climate
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Introduction
The climatological hurricane potential intensity maps and table presented here have been constructed using the National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) re-analysis data during the years 1982-1995, inclusive, and Reynolds’ CAC Global Sea Surface optimum interpolation temperature analysis. The graphs were made using the GrADS package available from the Center for Ocean-Land-Atmosphere studies (COLA).
Funding for this analysis was provided by the Risk Prediction Initiative (RPI).
The maps shown here represent the minimum sustainable surface pressure (mb) and maximum sustainable surface wind speed (m/s) in tropical cyclones. The calculations are performed using daily mean atmospheric conditions and weekly-updated sea surface temperatures, from the sources mentioned above. Potential intensities are calculated for each day in the data set and then averaged over each month to obtain monthly mean values.
Quantities displayed include the monthly mean intensities, averaged over all the years in the data set, their standard deviation, the 90th percentile of intensity (such that 10% of all the individual daily mean values in the given month represent greater intensity than this number), and the largest 90th percentile intensity within 1000 km of the point in question.
This latter calculation is provided to take into account intense storms that move rapidly through a strong gradient in potential intensity and may thus have an actual intensity in excess of the local potential intensity. (For example, hurricanes moving rapidly up the U.S. east coast may strike New York or Boston with actual intensities that greatly exceed the small local values of potential intensity.) Extreme care should be taken in interpreting these maps as there are few regions where storms can be expected to move rapidly enough to sustain intensities well in excess of potential intensities.
Maps showing the lowest monthly mean pressure and highest monthly mean wind speed in each year are also provided. The Table presents data for particular cities and regions.
Caution should be used in interpreting the 1000 km values, as there are many places for which this is inappropriate. For example, it is extremely unlikely that an intense storm could move up the west coast of North America fast enough to affect San Diego with anything close to full intensity. Moreover, these values are susceptible to anomalous point values of potential intensity.
The method used in calculating these quantities is described in a separate documentDOCUMENT. Note, however, that the calculations done here take into account the contribution to hurricane intensity from dissipative heating in the boundary layer. This changes the denominator of equation (1) in the document from CHARACTERS Ts to To. Experience using potential intensity estimates based on climatology indicate that few, if any, storms will ever exceed the potential intensity value; most storms will not achieve their potential intensity ADD PAGE(see figure).
The research that enabled the construction of these maps was supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant ATM-9724987.
- Monthly Mean Minimum Central Pressures (mb)
- Monthly Mean Maximum Surface Wind Speeds (m/s)
- Standard Deviation from Monthly Mean Minimum Central Pressures (mb)
- Standard Deviation from Monthly Mean Maximum Surface Wind Speeds (m/s)
- 90th Percentile Minimum Central Pressure (mb)
- 90th Percentile Maximum Surface Wind Speed (m/s)
- Lowest Value of 90th Percentile Minimum Surface Pressure (mb) within 1000 km of Each Point
- Largest Value of 90th Percentile Maximum Surface Wind Speed (m/s) within 1000 km of Each Point
- Lowest Monthly Mean Minimum Central Pressures (mb) in Each Year
Potential Intensity Estimates for Individual Cities and Regions
click images to enlarge
Monthly Mean Minimum Central Pressures (mb) | |
---|---|
January | ![]() |
February | ![]() |
March | ![]() |
April | ![]() |
May | ![]() |
June | ![]() |
July | ![]() |
August | ![]() |
September | ![]() |
October | ![]() |
November | ![]() |
December | ![]() |
Monthly Mean Maximum Surface Wind Speeds (m/s) | |
---|---|
January | ![]() |
February | ![]() |
March | ![]() |
April | ![]() |
May | ![]() |
June | ![]() |
July | ![]() |
August | ![]() |
September | ![]() |
October | ![]() |
November | ![]() |
December | ![]() |
Standard Deviation from Monthly Mean Minimum Central Pressures (mb) | |
---|---|
January | ![]() |
February | ![]() |
March | ![]() |
April | ![]() |
May | ![]() |
June | ![]() |
July | ![]() |
August | ![]() |
September | ![]() |
October | ![]() |
November | ![]() |
December | ![]() |
Standard Deviation from Monthly Mean Maximum Surface Wind Speeds (m/s) | |
---|---|
January | ![]() |
February | ![]() |
March | ![]() |
April | ![]() |
May | ![]() |
June | ![]() |
July | ![]() |
August | ![]() |
September | ![]() |
October | ![]() |
November | ![]() |
December | ![]() |
90th Percentile Minimum Central Pressure (mb) | |
---|---|
January | ![]() |
February | ![]() |
March | ![]() |
April | ![]() |
May | ![]() |
June | ![]() |
July | ![]() |
August | ![]() |
September | ![]() |
October | ![]() |
November | ![]() |
December | ![]() |
90th Percentile Maximum Surface Wind Speed (m/s) | |
---|---|
January | ![]() |
February | ![]() |
March | ![]() |
April | ![]() |
May | ![]() |
June | ![]() |
July | ![]() |
August | ![]() |
September | ![]() |
October | ![]() |
November | ![]() |
December | ![]() |
Lowest Value of 90th Percentile Minimum Surface Pressure (mb) within 1000 km of Each Point | |
---|---|
January | ![]() |
February | ![]() |
March | ![]() |
April | ![]() |
May | ![]() |
June | ![]() |
July | ![]() |
August | ![]() |
September | ![]() |
October | ![]() |
November | ![]() |
December | ![]() |
Largest Value of 90th Percentile Maximum Surface Wind Speed (m/s) within 1000 km of Each Point | |
---|---|
January | ![]() |
February | ![]() |
March | ![]() |
April | ![]() |
May | ![]() |
June | ![]() |
July | ![]() |
August | ![]() |
September | ![]() |
October | ![]() |
November | ![]() |
December | ![]() |
Lowest Monthly Mean Minimum Central Pressures (mb) in Each Year | |
---|---|
1982 | ![]() |
1983 | ![]() |
1984 | ![]() |
1985 | ![]() |
1986 | ![]() |
1987 | ![]() |
1988 | ![]() |
1989 | ![]() |
1990 | ![]() |
1991 | ![]() |
1992 | ![]() |
1993 | ![]() |
1994 | ![]() |
1995 | ![]() |
Highest Monthly Mean Maximum Surface Wind Speed (m/s) in Each Year | |
---|---|
1982 | ![]() |
1983 | ![]() |
1984 | ![]() |
1985 | ![]() |
1986 | ![]() |
1987 | ![]() |
1988 | ![]() |
1989 | ![]() |
1990 | ![]() |
1991 | ![]() |
1992 | ![]() |
1993 | ![]() |
1994 | ![]() |
1995 | ![]() |
Lowest Monthly 90th Percentile Minimum Central Pressure (mb) in Each Year | |
---|---|
1982 | ![]() |
1983 | ![]() |
1984 | ![]() |
1985 | ![]() |
1986 | ![]() |
1987 | ![]() |
1988 | ![]() |
1989 | ![]() |
1990 | ![]() |
1991 | ![]() |
1992 | ![]() |
1993 | ![]() |
1994 | ![]() |
1995 | ![]() |
Highest Monthly 90th Percentile Maximum Surface Wind Speed (m/s) in Each Year | |
---|---|
1982 | ![]() |
1983 | ![]() |
1984 | ![]() |
1985 | ![]() |
1986 | ![]() |
1987 | ![]() |
1988 | ![]() |
1989 | ![]() |
1990 | ![]() |
1991 | ![]() |
1992 | ![]() |
1993 | ![]() |
1994 | ![]() |
1995 | ![]() |
Lowest Monthly Value of 90th Percentile Minimum Central Pressures (mb) within 1000 km of Each Point in Each Year | |
---|---|
1982 | ![]() |
1983 | ![]() |
1984 | ![]() |
1985 | ![]() |
1986 | ![]() |
1987 | ![]() |
1988 | ![]() |
1989 | ![]() |
1990 | ![]() |
1991 | ![]() |
1992 | ![]() |
1993 | ![]() |
1994 | ![]() |
1995 | ![]() |
Largest Monthly Value of 90th Percentile Annual Maximum Surface Wind Speed (m/s) within 1000 km of Each Point in Each Year | |
---|---|
1982 | ![]() |
1983 | ![]() |
1984 | ![]() |
1985 | ![]() |
1986 | ![]() |
1987 | ![]() |
1988 | ![]() |
1989 | ![]() |
1990 | ![]() |
1991 | ![]() |
1992 | ![]() |
1993 | ![]() |
1994 | ![]() |
1995 | ![]() |
Potential Intensity Estimates for Individual Cities and Regions
Comments
Use extreme caution in interpreting 1000 km values (see note in Introduction).
Please direct any comments about the format of the maps or the algorithm used to calculate potential intensity to me at (mylastname) at mit.edu.